East Jerusalem

Precedent: Section of Separation Barrier around Jerusalem Ruled Illegal - near Sheikh Sa'ed

The Tel-Aviv Magistrate's Court granted the appeal of residents of Sheikh sa'ed, in East Jerusalem , opposing the separation barrier, and cancelled the requisition orders that had been issued to build the barrier. The court's appeals committee ruled that the planned route of the barrier would cause disproportionate harm to the daily lives of the residents, in part because it separates Sheik sa'ed from other neighborhoods of East Jerusalem . This is the first time that a court has voided a section of the separation barrier around Jerusalem . The appeal was filed by the Sheikh sa'ed Neighborhood Committee and five residents of the village, who were represented by attorney Ghiath Nasser.

In reaching its decision, the Appeals Committee, headed by Judge David Gladstein, rejected the state's argument that the village's residents constituted a security threat. The Appeals Committee recommended that the barrier be built east of the neighborhood, in a way that enables the residents to gain access to East Jerusalem .

B'Tselem welcomes the ruling, which will prevent the severing of Sheikh sa'ed from East Jerusalem . However, the separation barrier is still causing tremendous hardship to hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in the Jerusalem area, as a result of a route which is based on political and not security considerations.

Background

Sheikh sa'ed was not annexed to Israel in 1967, and remains formally part of the West Bank . Nevertheless, as a result of the difficult topographical conditions in the area, there is no road to link it to the West Bank, and access to the neighborhood is possible only through East Jerusalem . Therefore, in spite of the administrative separation, Sheikh sa'ed continued to function as part of East Jerusalem . In February 2004, B'Tselem published a report describing Sheikh sa'ed's detachment from Jerusalem and the West Bank , and what the residents could expect if the separation barrier would be built along the planned route. B'Tselem found that more than one-quarter of the residents of Sheikh sa'ed have already been forced to leave their homes because of the harsh restrictions Israel imposed on them, making their lives intolerable, and predicted that the remaining residents would ultimately have no choice but to leave their homes as well.

Suggested items

Homes in al-Walajah fenced off by the Separation Barrier built on village land. Above: The East Jerusalem neighborhood (settlement) of Gilo. Photo by Matan Golan

East Jerusalem

The village of al-Walajah: Dispossession and Home Demolitions

The village of al-Walajah, which is home to nearly 3,000 residents, now lies on a ridge south of Refaim Valley, near Beit Jala. It was originally located on the other side of the valley, near the current location of the Israeli moshav communities of Ora, and its lands spanned nearly 18,000 dunams (1,800 hectares). In 1949, as part of the armistice agreement between Israel and Jordan at the end of the 1948 war, al-Walajah residents left the village. Some relocated east, establishing a “new” al-Walajah on village lands spanning about 6,000 dunams (600 hectares) that remained on the other side of the Green Line. In 1967, after occupying the West Bank, Israel annexed about a third of this area to Jerusalem’s municipal boundaries. About half of the 6,000 dunams al-Walajah residents held onto after 1949 were exploited by Israel for its own purposes beginning as early as the 1970s. Some were expropriated to build Gilo – a settlement neighborhood inside Jerusalem’s city limits. Others were seized by military order to build the settlement of Har Gilo. The Jerusalem Municipality never provided local government services to the part of al-Walajah annexed to its territory, and refused to approve masterplans for it. Lacking any other choice, over the years, the residents built homes without permits. The neighborhood of 'Ein Jozah, located in the annexed part of the village, now has about 1,000 residents. Of the neighborhood’s 60 structures, 38 have pending demolition orders issued by the Ministry of Justice Land Enforcement Authority. The remaining 22 structures were also built without permits, and potentially face a similar fate. If the current demolition orders are implemented, 380 people will lose their homes. The demolition orders rely on the Kaminitz Law, which lays hefty fines for individuals who build without a permit or fail to demolish their own homes. In 2018, village residents submitted a petition to the High Court demanding the demolition orders be cancelled and a masterplan prepared for the part of the village included within the municipal boundaries of Jerusalem. The court issued an interim order pending a ruling in the petition. In a hearing in late March 2022, the court extended the interim order for another six months so the authorities could look into the possibility of preparing a masterplan. Through the years, village residents prepared their own masterplans, first with the help of Jerusalem architect Claude Rosenkovitch and later with help from NGOs Bimkom and Ir Amim. Every single plan was rejected by the municipal and district planning committees. In January 2021, the District Planning and Building Committee rejected another plan submitted by village residents, claiming the village lands hold “great scenic and environmental value, with a contiguity of open areas and ancient, extraordinary agrarian cultural values” which the plan undermines. The “scenic and environmental value” the committee mentioned refers to the unique terrace farming used by village residents. However, Israeli authorities bring up this reason only to block Palestinian construction and development. These values are never factored in when it comes to settlement development. For instance, 25 years ago, Israel built the al-Walajah bypass road on non-annexed village lands, providing Gush Etzion settlers access to Jerusalem until the Tunnel Road was built. The land for the road was seized using military orders and without any approved plans. The Gush Etzion regional council has recently submitted a plan for “regularizing” the road, which includes both legalizing and expanding it, and is a prerequisite for a 560-home expansion plan in the settlement of Har Gilo. The new structures would straddle al-Walajah from the west. The proposed road, which protrudes into Jerusalem city limits, is described in the plan as a traffic artery that would serve “both populations.” In practice, however, residents of al-Walajah would not be able to benefit from it, as they are prohibited from taking this road to enter Jerusalem. The plan was submitted to the Civil Administration Supreme Planning Council without an environmental impact report, geological surveys or hydrogeological surveys, despite the risk of landslides and rock avalanches in the area and the possible collapse of the road itself, as noted in objections to the plan filed by Bimkom on behalf of the village council. Similarly, damage to the unique ancient terraces in the area did not bother the Israeli authorities when they began construction work on the Separation Barrier northwest and south of 'Ein Jozah, and on the surrounding land, in 2011. In that case, the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel (SPNI) made a rare intervention and filed an expert opinion objecting to the route of the barrier in the area. The opinion described the scenic terraces, which date back to the middle of the first millennium, as a cultural asset that preserves traditional terrace farming. The SPNI advocated for preserving the area and declaring it a world heritage site. It also proposed relocating the barrier to the route of the al-Walajah bypass road, near the old train tracks leading into Jerusalem. In August 2011, the High Court dismissed the petition al-Walajah residents filed against the route of the barrier. The Separation Barrier, which in that area mostly takes the form of a nine-meter-tall concrete wall, was built on about 500 dunams (50 hectares) of al-Walajah village land. It has left residents with a single route in and out of the village, and has cut them off from farmland where they grew olive and almond trees. The residents must now coordinate access to these lands with the military in advance, and are granted access only during the olive harvest season, through a single gate located in nearby Beit Jala. The barrier has also obliterated shepherding in the village, as it has greatly reduced available pastureland and cut off access to freshwater springs in village lands that remain on the other side. In addition to all these, serious drainage issues caused by the barrier have further harmed the ancient terraces. Constructing the barrier also cleared the way for the Israel Nature and Parks Authority and for the Jerusalem Development Authority to advance the Emek Refaim National Park plan north of al-Walajah, touted as a metropolitan park intended to “benefit Jerusalem residents.” The plan was approved by the District Planning and Building Committee in July 2013, and the park was inaugurated in early 2018. It spans an area of about 5,700 dunams (570 hectares), 1,000 of which are al-Walajah village land. The park’s main attraction – the ‘Ein Khanya freshwater spring – used to be the village’s main source of water, which residents used for irrigation and leisure. Only two springs remain in al-Walajah today. Both require ongoing, costly drainage work. Unable to bear the cost, al-Walajah residents stopped using these, too, and now rely on water from a reservoir that the Palestinian Authority built near the Everest Hotel in Beit Jala to serve the communities of Beit Jala, al-Walajah and al-Khader.

17 February 2022

Planning Policy in the West Bank

A day of destruction in the West Bank: 22 people, including 15 children, lost their home in a single day

Yesterday (Tuesday, 23 November 2021), Israel embarked on a large-scale demolition campaign throughout the West Bank, in which it destroyed and confiscated dwellings, tents, livestock enclosures, buildings under construction, a road, and even a structure intended for burial. Twenty-two people, including 15 children, lost their homes in one day. Some of the demolitions were captured on video: Filmed by: Nasser Nawaj'ah, Hamdan Hamdan, 'Eid Hazalin, 'Amer 'Aruri Jerusalem Area: Israel demolishes three homes of six people, including three minors At around 6:00 A.M., Civil Administration personnel and Border Police officers arrived at the neighborhood of Wadi al-Humos, an eastern extension of Zur Baher in East Jerusalem. The forces bulldozed three buildings: a two-story building that was home to a family of five, including three minors, and a building that was home to one person. From there, the forces moved to the other side of the Separation Barrier and demolished a four-story building under construction that included three apartments. At around 6:00 A.M., Civil Administration personnel and Border Police officers arrived at the neighborhood of Wadi al-Humos, an eastern extension of Zur Baher in East Jerusalem. The forces bulldozed three buildings: a two-story building that was home to a family of five, including three minors, and a building that was home to one person. From there, the forces moved to the other side of the Separation Barrier and demolished a four-story building under construction that included three apartments. South Hebron Hills: Israel demolishes home under construction and burial infrastructure At around 10:00 A.M., Civil Administration personnel arrived with a military and Border Police escort to the village of Khirbet Ma’in in the South Hebron Hills. The forces bulldozed a house under construction that was home to a family of eight, including six minors. At around 1:00 P.M., the forces arrived at the village of a-Deirat, east of Yatta, and demolished a seven-room concrete structure intended for burial. Ramallah Area: Israel demolishes residential tent and confiscates agricultural structures Later that day, Civil Administration personnel came with a military escort to the community of Ras a-Tin, east of Ramallah, and dismantled and confiscated three tents that served as livestock enclosures. From there, they continued to ‘Ein Samia where, at around 2:30 P.M., they demolished a residential tent that was home a family of eight, including six minors. They also dismantled and confiscated two livestock enclosures. Nablus Area: Israel razes section of agricultural road recently renovated in ‘Asirah al-Shamaliyah At around 11:00 A.M., Civil Administration personnel came with a military escort to an existing agricultural road that the Palestinian Ministry of Agriculture and the ‘Asirah al-Shamaliyah Municipality began paving with asphalt about two months ago. The forces razed a 500-meter-long section of the road and placed seven dirt mounds at the entrance to the road from Nablus to prevent its use. The road is used by the residents of ‘Asirah al-Shamaliyah to reach their farmland and also connects the town to Nablus. The wave of demolitions expresses the perception of the Israeli regime, which holds that land is a resource intended primarily to serve the Jewish population. This regime uses a variety of administrative, planning and bureaucratic tools to implement this concept. Governments come and go, but the apartheid regime remains untouched.

24 November 2021

הגדר ליד בית בית סאחור. צילום: אייל הראובני, בצלם, 24.6.19. בתמונה הקטנה - עבאדללה ר'יית' (באדיבות המשפחה)

Open-Fire Policy

Egregious shootings receive official backing once again: Israeli Border Police kill 15-year-old and wound another Palestinian as they tried to cross Separation Barrier

At about 7:30 A.M. on the morning of the last Friday of Ramadan, 31 May 2019, seven members of the extended Gheith family set out from by car Hebron to Jerusalem to attend prayers at al-Aqsa Mosque. Luai Gheith – 45, a married father of nine who owns a factory in Hebron ¬– was behind the wheel. With him in the car were his son ‘Abdallah (15), his three daughters – Shaimaa (16), Tartil (14) and Daniyah (12) – his niece Sirin (14) and his nephew ‘A. (18) During Ramadan, Israel allowed more Palestinians into Jerusalem for prayers than usual, but young men between the ages of 16 and 30 were still barred entry. Therefore, Gheith’s nephew, ‘A., would not be allowed through the checkpoint. Gheith drove towards the Mazmuriyeh/a-Nu’man checkpoint northeast of the Palestinian town of Beit Sahur, to drop off ‘A. and ‘Abdallah near the Separation Barrier, at a spot about 700 meters from the checkpoint. The plan was that they would climb over the barrier and meet the rest of the family on the other side, as many Palestinians do. The Separation Barrier in that area is made up of concertina wire at ground level and a chain link and barbed wire fence that is several meters high. The concertina is separated from the main fence by a path several meters wide. B’Tselem’s investigation found that at around 8:00 A.M., Luai dropped off his son and nephew next to the barrier. Ten or so young men were already there, waiting for a chance to climb over. ‘Abdallah and ‘A. did not see any security forces nearby and decided to make the attempt. They climbed over the concertina wire onto the buffer path. At that point, ‘A. spotted a Border Police officer standing on the other side of the main fence. He jumped back over the concertina wire and shouted to ‘Abdallah to flee. At that point, Border Police officers fired two 0.22-caliber bullets at ‘Abdallah, one of which hit him in the chest. ‘Abdallah managed to leap back over the concertina and run several meters away before collapsing. Luai Gheith, who was still there, drove them to al-Hussein Hospital in Beit Jala. The medical team tried to save ‘Abdallah, but in vain. In a testimony he gave B’Tselem field researcher Musa Abu Hashhash on 1 June 2019, Gheith described the pain of losing his son: I raised my son for fifteen years, and I still can’t believe that he was martyred in the blink of an eye. He didn’t do anything wrong. He just wanted to get to al-Aqsa Mosque for prayers on the last Friday of Ramadan. He was daring and I think that’s what got him killed. He was in a rush to get to al-Aqsa and didn’t wait like the other young men. ‘Abdallah was a good boy. He was cheerful and everyone loved him. He used to help me at work after school. He loved his family and was always joking around with his sisters. I can still see him cracking jokes with them and with my niece in the car that morning. He was so excited to be going to pray at al-Aqsa on the last Friday of Ramadan. The Israeli police officer who shot him doesn’t know any of that. Nor does he know anything of the shock and heartache he caused me and my wife and my daughters, or that we will never find comfort again. About half an hour to an hour earlier, at the same spot, Border Police shot and injured M.T., a 20-year-old Palestinian from the village of Hadab al-Fawar, south of Hebron. M.T., who works at a book and stationery store, had gotten there at around 5:30 A.M., also planning to cross the Separation Barrier so he could go to al-Aqsa Mosque for prayers. In a testimony he gave B’Tselem, he said he waited until after 7:00 and then tried to cross. After climbing over the concertina wire, he heard what sounded like gunshots fired with a silencer. He jumped back across the wire and gained some distance before realizing he had been hit in the stomach. M.T. was taken by private car to Beit Sahur and from there by ambulance to al-Hussein Hospital in Beit Jala, where he underwent surgery. He was discharged a week later. In both cases, Border Police fired at the upper body of individuals merely for trying to cross the Separation Barrier to get to prayers in East Jerusalem: 15-year-old ‘Abdallah Gheith was killed and M.T., was hit in the abdomen. There can be no justification for this type of gunfire, with its predictably fatal consequences. It shows just how little the lives of Palestinians count in the eyes of both the officers in the field and the entire chain of command that allows such actions to take place. Israeli media quoted Border Police officials as saying that Gheith and M.T. were shot with crowd control measures. Yet 0.22-caliber bullets are live ammunition for all intents and purposes and, therefore, cannot be considered crowd control measures. In theory, the military acknowledges this fact: A full decade ago, the MAG stated in a letter to B’Tselem that 0.22 bullets would be used only in instances that justified live fire, i.e., only in cases of mortal danger to security personnel or others. In practice, lethal use of 0.22-caliber bullets continues, and they are still perceived as a means of crowd control. Based on past experience, no one – neither the officers who killed ‘Abdallah Gheith and injured M.T., nor persons higher up the chain of command, including those responsible for formulating the orders and regulations – will be held accountable. Moreover, Israel will not have to pay damages to the families, having passed legislation conveniently barring Palestinians from any viable option of suing the state for damages. Was the shooting of 15-year-old ‘Abdallah and 20-year-old M.T. criminal? Absolutely. It was entirely unjustifiable. Neither ‘Abdallah nor M.T. posed any danger. Nor could they have posed any danger as they were: in broad daylight, caught between concertina wire on one side and a high barbed wire fence on the other, facing Border Police officers who were armed and ready and in protective gear. This is not a case of mortal danger, or in fact of any danger at all. Under such circumstances, the use of weapons capable of causing serious injury and even death – as has been done before and as the officers did here – cannot be justified on any moral or legal grounds. The fact that the predictable and deadly outcome of this egregious conduct is met by public indifference and that the conduct receives the full backing of all official bodies demonstrates just how little worth is accorded Palestinian lives.

24 June 2019